|
PHARMACOLOGY |
|
Year : 2009 | Volume
: 1
| Issue : 1 | Page : 57-62 |
|
|
Protective effect of polyherbal formulation on simvastatin hepatotoxicity in rats
J Vaghasiya, S Rathod, Y Bhalodia, R Manek, S Malaviya, N Jivani
Smt. R.B. Patel Mahila Pharmacy College, S.N.D.T Women's University, Atkot, Gujarat, India
Correspondence Address: J Vaghasiya Smt. R.B. Patel Mahila Pharmacy College, S.N.D.T Women's University, Atkot, Gujarat India

DOI: 10.4103/0975-1483.51883
Objective: This study was designed to assess the effect of polyherbal formulation (PHF) on simvastatin hepatotoxicity in rats and to assess the possibility of co-administration of PHF along with hepatotoxic drugs. Methods: Hepatotoxicity in rats was induced by simvastatin (20 mg/kg p.o. for 30 days) and the protective effect of PHF (0.25 ml/kg/p.o. and 0.5 ml/kg/p.o. either along with drug or followed by inducing hepatotoxicity) was identified by estimating marker enzymes for liver function such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and g glutamic transpeptidase; oxidative stress markers such as lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione, super oxide dismutase, and catalase; and protein profile such as total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total albumin, and total protein. A histopathological study was also carried out to confirm hepatotoxicity. Results and Discussions: Simvastatin hepatotoxicity was characterized by a significant increase in oxidative stress along with marker enzymes of liver function and depletion of proteins. Administration of PHF either along with simvastatin or followed by inducing hepatotoxicity significantly improved the level of marker enzymes for liver function, oxidative stress, and protein profile. Conclusion: The study suggests a protective role of PHF on simvastatin hepatotoxicity and it can be utilized to treat hepatotoxicity with long-term clinically useful drugs. Keywords: Hepatotoxicity, liver function, oxidative stress, protein profile, polyherbal formulation, simvastatin
How to cite this article: Vaghasiya J, Rathod S, Bhalodia Y, Manek R, Malaviya S, Jivani N. Protective effect of polyherbal formulation on simvastatin hepatotoxicity in rats. J Young Pharmacists 2009;1:57-62 |
How to cite this URL: Vaghasiya J, Rathod S, Bhalodia Y, Manek R, Malaviya S, Jivani N. Protective effect of polyherbal formulation on simvastatin hepatotoxicity in rats. J Young Pharmacists [serial online] 2009 [cited 2013 Apr 19];1:57-62. Available from: /text.asp?2009/1/1/57/51883 |
Introduction | |  |
Drug-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH) accounts for 9.5% of all suspected adverse drug reactions and are the most common reason for withdrawal of a drug from the market. The liver is a central metabolizing organ so it more susceptible to metabolism-dependant injury. Thus, injury may be a direct toxic effect or immunological reaction to either the drug or an active metabolite formed by bioactivation. [1] It is reported that 62% of withdrawn drugs have toxic metabolites. [2] Although, with the exception of rare cases, DIH subsides after cessation of treatment with the drug, which represents an important diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for physicians.
Simvastatin (SMT) competitively inhibits HMG-CoA to mevalonate. Mevalonate is also a precursor of Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10). Thus, treatment with statins could also lower its levels. CoQ10 acts as an antioxidant, has membrane stabilising effects, and is important for cellular mitochondrial respiration, which is essential for energy production in organs. [3],[4] Thus, simvastatin causes oxidative stress mediated hepatotoxicity by depleting antioxidant enzymes. [5]
Polyherbal formulation (PHF) contains the plant extracts of Himsra, Kasani, Kakamachi, Arjuna, Kashmarda, Birranjshipa, Jharuka and is processsed in 50 mg herbs each in the powder form of Bhringraja, Punarnava, Guduch, Daruharidra, Mulaka, Amalaki, Chitraka, Vidanga, Haritaki, and Parpata. Each individual herb has reported hepatoprotective, liver tonic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity.
In our previous study, in-vivo evaluation of simvastatin hepatotoxicity was carried out and we have reported that SMT causes oxidative stress mediated hepatotoxicity in rats. [5] The main objective of this study was to assess the hepatoprotective effect of PHF in simvastatin hepatotoxicity and to assess the possibility of co-administration along with such hepatotoxic drugs.
Materials and Methods | |  |
Animals
The protocol described in this study was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of M. S. University, Baroda and received permission from the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India. Healthy adult male Wistar rats weighing 150-200 g were used. Rats were housed in polypropylene cages, maintained under standardized condition (12 hr light/dark cycles, 24°C, 35 to 60% humidity) and provided free access to palleted CHAKKAN diet (Nav Maharashtra Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd., Pune) and purified drinking water ad libitum.
Experimental Protocol
Animals were divided into seven different groups, each having 6 rats and treated accordingly. Group 1: rats received a normal standard diet for 24 days; Group 2: rats received PHF (0.25 ml/kg/p.o. alone for 30 days); Group 3: rats received SMT (20 mg/kg p.o. for 30 days) (5); Group 4: rats received SMT along with PHF (0.25 ml/kg/p.o. for 30 days); Group 5: rats received SMT along with PHF (0.5 ml/kg/p.o. for 30 days); Group 6: rats received SMT followed by PHF (0.25 ml/kg/p.o. for 1 week); Group 7: rats received SMT along with silymarin (20 mg/kg/p.o.).
Collection of Serum
Blood samples were withdrawn from the retro-orbital plexus under light ether anesthesia without any anticoagulant and allowed to clot for 10 minutes at room temperature. The blood was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 20 minutes. The serum obtained was kept at 4ºC until used. All the animals were euthanized after blood collection using the spinal dislocation method and the liver was removed for study of histopathology.
Estimation of Liver Function
Estimation of marker enzymes for liver functions such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were done by using a kit provided by Span Diagnostic Ltd., India and γ glutamic transpeptidase (γGTP) was done using a kit from Dade Behring Ltd., UK. Estimation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was done using a kit fom Enzopak-Reckon diagnostics. Protein profile such as total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, total albumin, and total protein were done using a kit from Span Diagnostic Ltd, India.
Estimation of Oxidative Stress Markers
All the animals were euthanized after blood collection with the spinal dislocation method under light ether anesthesia and the liver was removed for study of oxidative stress markers and histopathological evaluation. The liver was kept in cold conditions (precooled in inverted petridish on ice). It was cross-chopped with a surgical scalpel into fine slices in chilled 0.25 M sucrose and quickly blotted on a filter paper. The tissue was minced and homogenized in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4 (10%w/v) with 25 strokes of tight teflon pestle of glass homogenizer at a speed of 2500 rpm. The clear supernatant was used for oxidative stress marker assays like lipid peroxidation, [6] reduced glutathione, [7] super oxide dismutase, [8] and catalase. [9]
Histopathological Study
The liver was collected after the rats were sacrificed. After blotting free of blood and tissue fluids, the liver was kept in 5% formalin. A 5-15 µm thick section was serially cut on a leitz microtome in a horizontal plane and mounted on a glass slide with the help of egg albumin in glycerin solution (50% v/v). They were then stained with 10% hematoxyline for 3-5 minutes and placed in running water intensified the staining. The hematoxyline stained sections were stained with 10% eosin for 2 minutes. The sections were observed and desired areas were photographed using an Olympus photomicroscope. The sections were viewed under 40X magnification.
Statistical Analysis
All the data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests using the computer based fitting program (Prism, Graphpad). Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Results | |  |
The Effect of PHF on Marker Enzymes of Liver Function [Table 1]
Serum levels of ALT and AST were significantly increased ( P <0.001) after treatment with simvastatin compared with control. Correspondingly, there was a significant increase ( P <0.001) in the ratio of ALT/AST after administration of simvastatin [Figure 1A]. Treatment with simvastatin showed a significant increase ( P <0.001) in serum γGTP, ALP, and LDH compared with control. PHF (0.25 ml/kg) alone did not have any effect on the levels of ALT, AST, γGTP, ALP, and LDH but PHF (0.25 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg) when administrated along with or after treatment with simvastatin produced a significant decrease ( P<0.001) in the levels of ALT, AST, γGTP, ALP, and LDH. Silymarin treatment also produced a significant decrease (P <0.001) in the levels of these enzymes but was less than PHF. Correspondingly, there was a significant decrease ( P <0.001) in the ratio of ALT/AST after treatment with PHF and Silymarin [Figure 1A].
The Effect of PHF on the Protein Profile in SMT Treated Rats [Table 2]
Simvastatin administration caused a significant increase ( P <0.001) in serum total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin and a significant decrease ( P <0.01) was found in direct bilirubin compared with control. Simvastatin produced a significant decrease ( P <0.001) in serum total protein compared with control. There was no significant change observed in serum globulin and albumin after treatment with simvastatin. PHF (0.25 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg) along with simvastatin, PHF (0.25 ml/kg) followed by simvastatin, and silymarin showed a significant decrease ( P <0.001) in total bilirubin and indirect bilirubin and a significant increase ( P <0.01) was observed in direct bilirubin compared with simvastatin control. PHF (0.25 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg) along with simvastatin was found to cause a significant increase ( P <0.001) in total protein compared with simvastatin control. PHF (0.25ml/kg) followed by simvastatin and silymarin treatment caused a significant increase ( P <0.01) in total protein. PHF (0.25 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg) along with simvastatin, followed by simvastatin did not have any significant effect on the levels of globulin and albumin. Correspondingly, the changes were observed in the ratio of albumin/ globulin but that was not statistically significant [Figure 1B].
The Effect of PHF on Oxidative Stress Markers in SMT Treated Rats [Table 3]
Simvastatin significantly increased (p<0.001) lipid peroxidation compared with control [Figure 1]. Tissue levels of GSH, SOD, and CAT were significantly decreased (p<0.001) after treatment with simvastatin compared with control. PHF (0.25 ml/kg and 0.5 ml/kg) along with simvastatin and PHF (0.25 ml/kg) followed by simvastatin was found to cause a significant decrease (p<0.001) in lipid peroxidation and a significant increase (p<0.001) in the levels of GSH, SOD, and CAT as compared with simvastatin control. Silymarin along with simvastatin produced an effect similar to PHF.
The Effect of PHF on the Histopathological Changes in SMT Hepatotoxicity
The liver section of the control rats revealed normal hepatic hexagonal lobules and normal morphology [Figure 2A]. Liver tissue of simvastatin-treated rats showed degeneration of hepatocytes [Figure 2C]. PHF and silymarin treatment improved the structural integrity of liver cells [Figure 2D],[Figure 2E],[Figure 2F],[Figure 2G].
Discussion | |  |
As the cells are damaged, ALT and AST are enzymes produced within the cells of the liver that leaks into the bloodstream leading to a rise in the serum levels. ALP is an enzyme that is associated with the biliary tract and is elevated; biliary tract damage and inflammation should be considered. It is often used to confirm that alkaline phosphatase is of hepatic etiology by γGTP. Mild to moderate elevation of ALT, AST, and ALP (1-3 times) are usually seen in drug toxicity.[10],[11],[12] This decrease in elevated serum ALT, AST, ALT/AST, γGTP, ALP, and LDH levels in PHF along with or followed by simvastatin-treated animals in part may be due to the protective effect of PHF on liver cells following the restoration of liver cell membrane permeability. [13]
This protective effect indicates a reduction in enzymes present in the extra cellular milieu of the liver cell. The protective effect of the component of PHF has also been observed in several experimental studies. [14],[15] It can be stated that PHF contains Tamarix gallica and crude herbal extracts of Capparis spinosa, Cichorium intybus, Solanum nigrum, T. arjuna, and A. millefolium . These medicinal herbs alone or in combination can influence a restoration of the cellular functions and structural integrity of the liver.
PHF along with and followed by simvastatin significantly normalized total bilirubin, total protein, direct bilirubin, and albumin indicating liver curative effect. The curative and hepatoprotective effect of Cassia occidentalis, Cichorium intybus, and Solanum nigrum of PHF were observed against chemically induced liver damage in experimental animals. [16] The diuretic effect of T. arjuna and the anti-inflammatory and anti-immunotoxicity effects of Cichorium intybus have been shown in clinical and experimental studies. [17],[18]
In our previous study, we reported that simvastatin caused oxidative stress mediated hepatotoxicity. [5] PHF along with and followed by simvastatin significantly reduced lipid peroxidation and increased antioxidant enzymes such as GSH, SOD, and CAT as compared with simvastatin-treated animals indicating modification of oxidative stress by PHF. The protection of liver cells against toxic materials including drugs, lipid peroxidation, and free radical injury may decrease inflammation. [19] Immune dysfunction is a component of liver disease and thus immunomodulation by herbal therapy prevents oxidative stress and inflammation and strengthens the detoxifying power of the liver cell. [20] The anti-oxidative property of esculetin and p-methoxybenzoic acid, the main constituents of Cichorium intybus and Capparis spinosa , respectively, have been reported in chemically-induced hepatotoxicity in experimental animals. [21],[22] Achillea millefolium , another component of PHF, contains flavonoids and terpenoids with anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties. [23],[24] Furthermore, the anti-oxidative property of the flavonoid content of Tamarix gallica and the inhibitory effect Solanum nigrum crude extracts on free radical-mediated DNA damage increases the hepatoprotective effect of PHF. [25] In addition, the antioxidative, anti-lipoproxidative and the increase in glutathione content of the liver cells was observed with arjunolic acid and flavonoids present in T. Arjuna. [26]
Although there is insufficient information to establish the mechanism of action of PHF protection, this could be due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative immunomodulating as well as restorative effects.
Conclusion | |  |
The study suggests a protective role of PHF (Livpep) in drug-induced hepatotoxicity and this effect may be due to its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative as well as restorative effects. PHF can be utilized to treat hepatotoxicity with long-term clinically useful drugs, which are at risk of developing hepatotoxicity.
Acknowledgement | |  |
We are deeply indebted to M/S Apostle Remedies, Vadodara for providing gift samples of Polyherbal Formulation (Livpep).
References | |  |
1. | Zimmerman H. Hepatotoxicity: the adverse effects of drugs and other chemicals on the liver. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999. |
2. | Kaplowitz N. Biochemical and cellular mechanisms of toxic liver injury. Semin Liver Dis 2002;22:137-44. |
3. | Frei B, Kim M, Ames B. Ubiquinol-10 is an effective lipid-soluble antioxidant at physiological concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 1990;87:4879-83. |
4. | Stocker R, Bowry VW, Frei B. Ubiquinone-10 protects low density lipoprotein more efficiently against lipid peroxidation than does alphatocopherol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:1646-50. |
5. | Vaghasiya JD, Bhalodia YS, Manek RA, Gohil TA, Rathod SP. Oxidative stress mediated hepatotoxicity Produced by simvastatin. Pharmacologyonline 2008;3:495-503. |
6. | Slater TF, Sawyer BC. The stimulatory effects of carbon tetrachloride and other halogenoalkanes or peroxidative reactions in liver fractions in vitro. Biochem J 1971;123:805-14. |
7. | Moran MS, Depierre JW, Mannervik B. Levels of glutathione, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase activities in rat lung and liver. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 1979;582:67-78. |
8. | Misra HP, Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the autooxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay of SOD. J Biol Chem 1972;247:3170-5. |
9. | Aebi H. Oxidoreductases acting on groups other than CHOH: Catalase. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO, Packer L, editors. Methods in Enzymology. London: Academic Press; 1984. p. 121-5. |
10. | Rosen HR, Keefe EB. Evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes, use of liver tests and the serology of viral hepatitis: Liver disease, diagnosis and management. 1 st ed. New York: Churchill livingstone publishers; 2000. p. 24-35. |
11. | Friedman SF, Martin P, Munoz JS. Laboratory evaluation of the patient with liver disease. Hepatology, a textbook of liver disease. Vol. 1. Philedelphia: Saunders Publication; 2003. p. 661-709. |
12. | Simko V. Alkaline phosphatases in biology and medicine. Dig Dis 1991;9:189-209. |
13. | Kalab M and Krechler, T. The effect of the heptoprotective agent Liv-52 on liver damage. Cas Lek Cesk 1997;136:758-60. |
14. | Sandhir R, Gill KD. Hepatoprotective effects of Liv-52 on ethanol induced liver damage in rats. Indian J Exp Biol 1999;37:762-6. |
15. | Mathur S. Role of Liv-52 in protection against beryllium intoxication. Biol Trace Elem Res 1994;41:201-15. |
16. | Kanase A, Patil S, Thorat B. Curative effects of mandur bhasma on liver and kidney of albino rats after induction of acute hepatitis by CCl4. Indian J Exp Biol 1997;35:754-64. |
17. | Bharani A, Ganguly A, Bhargava KD. Salutary effect of Terminalia arjuna in patients with severe refractory heart failure. Int J Cardiol 1995;49:91-9. |
18. | Kim JH, Mun YJ, Woo WH, Jeon KS, Park JS. Effects of the ethanol extract of Cichorium intybus on the immunotoxicity by ethanol in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 2002;2:733-44. |
19. | Yang H, Chen Y, Xu R, Shen W, Chen G. Clinical observation on the long-term therapeutic effects of traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of liver fibrosis. J Tradit China Med 2000;20:247-50. |
20. | Jiang W, Li S, Wang C, Wang Y. Comparative study of effects of three kinds of herbal mixture decoctions on improving immune senescence and free radical metabolism. Chin Med J (Engl) 1997;110:750-4. |
21. | Gilani AH, Janbaz KH, Shah BH, Martin-Aragon S, Benedi JM, Villar AM. Effects of the antioxidant (6,7-dihydroxycoumarin) esculetin on the glutathione system and lipid peroxidation in mice. Gerontology 1998;44:21-5. |
22. | Germano MP, De Pasquale R, D'Angelo V, Catania S, Silvari V, Costa C. Evaluation of extracts and isolated fraction from Capparis spinosa L. buds as an antioxidant source. J Agric Food Chem 2002;27:1168-71. |
23. | Glasl S, Mucaji P, Werner I, Presser A, Jurenitsch J. Sesquiterpenes and flavonoid aglycones from a Hungarian taxon of the Achillea millefolium group. Z Naturforsch [C] 2002;57:976-82. |
24. | Goldberg AS, Mueller EC, Eigen E, Desalva SJ. Isolation of the anti-inflammatory principles from Achillea millefolium (Compositae). J Pharm Sci 1969;58:938-41. |
25. | McPhail DB, Hartley RC, Gardner PT, Duthie GG. Kinetic and stoichiometric assessments of the anti-oxidant activity of flavonoids by electron spin resonance spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 2003;12:1684-90. |
26. | Sumitra M, Manikandan P, Kumar DA, Arutselvan NK, Manohar BM, Puvanakrishnan R. Experimental myocardial necrosis in rats: role of arjunolic acid on platelet aggregation, coagulation and antioxidant status. Mol Cell Biochem 2001;224:135-42. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 1A], [Figure 1B], [Figure 2A], [Figure 2C], [Figure 2D], [Figure 2E], [Figure 2F], [Figure 2G]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|